<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IT Management and Strategy Consulting &#124; Enirtia Consulting &#187; Microsoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oddjobsintech.com/category/microsoft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oddjobsintech.com</link>
	<description>Managing the Business of Information Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:05:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Did Microsoft Miss The Boat On Windows 7 Pricing?</title>
		<link>http://oddjobsintech.com/did-microsoft-miss-the-boat-on-windows-7-pricing/</link>
		<comments>http://oddjobsintech.com/did-microsoft-miss-the-boat-on-windows-7-pricing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows XP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oddjobsintech.com/?p=269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href=http://oddjobsintech.com/did-microsoft-miss-the-boat-on-windows-7-pricing/><img src=http://enirtia.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/windows7-boxes-150x150.jpg class=imgtfe hspace=5 align=left width=100  border=0></a>
Microsoft announced the Windows 7 retail pricing structure for all of the various versions of the operating system today, and at first glance it looks at though they missed the boat. While Windows 7 looks very promising thus far, as seen in the betas and Release Candidates, it looks as though they are going to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" title="windows7-boxes" src="http://enirtia.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/windows7-boxes-150x150.jpg" alt="windows7-boxes" width="150" height="150" /></p>
<p>Microsoft announced the Windows 7 retail pricing structure for all of the various versions of the operating system today, and at first glance it looks at though they missed the boat. While Windows 7 looks very promising thus far, as seen in the betas and Release Candidates, it looks as though they are going to drive folks away from it by maintaining nearly identical pricing to Vista, which the world seems to agree was one of Microsoft&#8217;s worst efforts to date. However, as usual Microsoft has an ace in the hole.</p>
<p><strong>Pricing is as follows:</strong></p>
<p>Home Premium       $199.99 Full / $119.99 Upgrade / $49 Pre-order before July 11<br />
Professional              $299.99 Full / $199.99 Upgrade /$99 Pre-order before July 11<br />
Ultimate                     $399.99 Full / $219.99 Upgrade</p>
<p><strong>Most Consumers Don&#8217;t Buy Windows<br />
</strong></p>
<p>What Microsoft normally banks on is the fact that most people don&#8217;t buy individual copies of Windows and install them on their existing computers, they get Windows when they buy a new computer. Which in my mind is why Microsoft should lower the retail price significantly, so that they can fight the public perception that Windows is expensive, but they won&#8217;t because that would require them to undercut what they are selling the licenses to OEMs and businesses at. Doing so would cause an uproar with some of their biggest partners and clients.</p>
<p>Microsoft also knows that Windows 7 seems to run better than Vista on existing computers that are currently running Vista and XP. This has not traditionally been the case. In the past with every new Windows release, if you simply upgraded your existing computer there was a performance hit, your computer usually would run slower than under the old operating system. This does not seem to be the case under Windows 7, which seems to fly on older computers and lower powered systems like Netbooks. All of this means that the potential market for retail boxed copy licenses for Windows 7 is greater than previous versions of Windows. Also with the current economic conditions people are more likely to upgrade than spend money on a whole new computer.</p>
<p><strong>Pre-Ordering Offers The Most Value</strong></p>
<p>If you are one of the many that are actually planning on buying a retail boxed copy of Windows 7, I encourage you to pre-order it before July 11th, 2009, as this would entitle you to the lower pricing of $49 and $99 for Home Premium and Professional respectively.</p>
<table style="height: 74px;" border="0" width="40">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oddjobsintech.com/did-microsoft-miss-the-boat-on-windows-7-pricing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Active Directory Tip: Access External Website With The Same Domain Name As Your Internal Domain</title>
		<link>http://oddjobsintech.com/active-directory-tip-access-external-website-with-the-same-domain-name-as-your-internal-domain/</link>
		<comments>http://oddjobsintech.com/active-directory-tip-access-external-website-with-the-same-domain-name-as-your-internal-domain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Active Directory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oddjobsintech.com/?p=249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href=http://oddjobsintech.com/active-directory-tip-access-external-website-with-the-same-domain-name-as-your-internal-domain/><img src=http://oddjobsintech.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/2932336088_274423cab9_m-150x1501.jpg class=imgtfe hspace=5 align=left width=100  border=0></a>It is often the case that companies use their external domain (i.e. enirtia.com) for their internal Active Directory domain, and this is completely fine, except when you want to access your website which is hosted on an external server.
Active Directory automatically sets up an internal DNS server for use on your network, and assumes that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-250" title="2932336088_274423cab9_m-150x1501" src="http://oddjobsintech.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/2932336088_274423cab9_m-150x1501.jpg" alt="2932336088_274423cab9_m-150x1501" width="150" height="150" />It is often the case that companies use their external domain (i.e. enirtia.com) for their internal Active Directory domain, and this is completely fine, except when you want to access your website which is hosted on an external server.</p>
<p>Active Directory automatically sets up an internal DNS server for use on your network, and assumes that it is the Authorative server for the domain you used, which in our case here is &#8220;example.com&#8221;. When clients on your internal network ask your Active Directory DNS server for a lookup on example.com it is going to direct them to one of your domain controllers. If you request&#8221;www.enirtia.com&#8221; and you happen to have IIS running on one of those domain controllers you will see whatever the default website that is running on that server.</p>
<p>To get around this we need to add a redirect to your IIS server, a Host record to your internal DNS server, and a delegation to your DNS server, all of which are simple to do. These changes are based on the assumption that your external website is setup on external DNS servers with an &#8220;A&#8221; record pointing&#8221;www.enirtia.com&#8221; to the IP address of the server that is hosting your website, and that example.com without the &#8220;www&#8221; is setup with a CNAME record pointing at&#8221;www.enirtia.com&#8221;. If it is setup in the opposite manner this will not work.</p>
<p>Host Record:</p>
<p>First find out what the IP address is of the external web server if you do not already know it. Go to Start &gt; Control Panel &gt; Administrative Tools &gt; DNS and locate example.com. Right-click and choose &#8220;New Host (A or AAAA)&#8221;. Type &#8220;www&#8221; into the name field, and the IP address of your external web server into the IP Address field. Click the &#8220;Add Host&#8221; button to save.</p>
<p>IIS Redirect:</p>
<p>To redirect &#8220;http://enirtia.com&#8221; to &#8220;http://www.enirtia.com we need to create a redirect in your IIS server. Go to Start &gt; Control Panel &gt; Administrative Tools &gt; Internet Information Services and locate the Default Web Site. Right-Click on the default web site, and choose Properties. Go to the Directory tab and setup a redirect to point to&#8221;www.enirtia.com&#8221;.</p>
<p>DNS Delegation:</p>
<p>To create a DNS Delegation you must know the names of external name servers servicing your domain name. Go to Start &gt; Control Panel &gt; Administrative Tools &gt; DNS and locate example.com. Right-Click and choose &#8220;New Delegation&#8221;. Type www into the Delegated Domain field, click next and provide it with external authorative name servers for your domain name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oddjobsintech.com/active-directory-tip-access-external-website-with-the-same-domain-name-as-your-internal-domain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows 7, Now With Less Internet Explorer</title>
		<link>http://oddjobsintech.com/windows-7-without-internet-explorer/</link>
		<comments>http://oddjobsintech.com/windows-7-without-internet-explorer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 20:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oddjobsintech.com/?p=213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href=http://oddjobsintech.com/windows-7-without-internet-explorer/><img src=http://oddjobsintech.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/windows-7.jpg class=imgtfe hspace=5 align=left width=100  border=0></a>On the MSDN Windows 7 Engineering blog, Jack Mayo &#8211; Program Manager for Windows Docs &#38; Printing group &#8211; has an interesting post about how the forthcoming Windows 7 Public Release Candidate will feature an &#8220;On-Off&#8221; switch for many Microsoft applications that have traditionally been bundled with previous Windows releases. One of these applications is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-214" title="windows-7" src="http://oddjobsintech.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/windows-7.jpg" alt="windows-7" width="101" height="84" />On the <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/e7/archive/2009/03/06/beta-to-rc-changes-turning-windows-features-on-or-off.aspx" target="_blank">MSDN Windows 7 Engineering blog</a>, Jack Mayo &#8211; Program Manager for Windows Docs &amp; Printing group &#8211; has an interesting post about how the forthcoming Windows 7 Public Release Candidate will feature an &#8220;On-Off&#8221; switch for many Microsoft applications that have traditionally been bundled with previous Windows releases. One of these applications is Internet Explorer 8.</p>
<p>Unlike the traditional Add/Remove Windows Components functionality, the switches will not fully remove the applications do to internal Windows and developer dependencies on components of the applications. Instead it merely deletes the &#8220;.exe&#8221; and any shortcuts for the applications. Should the user decide that they actually need the applications they can flip the switch back and regain full functionality.</p>
<p><span id="articleBody">The other </span><span id="articleBody">applications &amp; services that can be switched off are: Windows Media Player, Windows Media Center, Windows DVD Maker, Windows Search services, Handwriting recognition, Windows gadgets, fax and scan, an</span><span id="articleBody">d the XPS viewer and some other misc services.</span></p>
<p>This move is most likely to appease those examining Microsoft for Antitrust issues in the EU. Microsoft has long maintained that they are unable to extract the browser from the OS due to the way it is built, which was one of the sticking points in their US Antitrust case nearly a decade ago. While I do not agree with those that are claiming the bundling of IE with Windows is anti competitive, I do applaud Microsoft for giving users a choice, for a change. I think that it is their product and they should be able to do anything they want with it, short of putting technical roadblocks for 3rd parties developers to make their applications run on the OS. Users are fully capable of installing alternative products if they choose to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oddjobsintech.com/windows-7-without-internet-explorer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UPDATE: Microsoft to Get Yahoo Afterall?</title>
		<link>http://oddjobsintech.com/update-microsoft-to-get-yahoo-afterall/</link>
		<comments>http://oddjobsintech.com/update-microsoft-to-get-yahoo-afterall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oddjobsintech.com/?p=195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an earlier post I talked about a new Yahoo/Microsoft/3rd party deal rumor. Well, it is looking like it may just be that, a rumor. According to Bloomberg, an unidentified Microsoft spokesperson is denying the rumor. We will have to wait to see if this is a real denial or a fake denial.
Easy come, easy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an <a href="http://oddjobsintech.com/microsoft-to-get-yahoo-afterall/" target="_blank">earlier post</a> I talked about a new Yahoo/Microsoft/3rd party deal rumor. Well, it is looking like it may just be that, a rumor. <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=asskVazB1jx0&amp;refer=home" target="_blank">According to Bloomberg</a>, an unidentified Microsoft spokesperson is denying the rumor. We will have to wait to see if this is a real denial or a fake denial.</p>
<p>Easy come, easy go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oddjobsintech.com/update-microsoft-to-get-yahoo-afterall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft to Get Yahoo Afterall?</title>
		<link>http://oddjobsintech.com/microsoft-to-get-yahoo-afterall/</link>
		<comments>http://oddjobsintech.com/microsoft-to-get-yahoo-afterall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oddjobsintech.com/?p=193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, it looks like there is another rumor going around that Yahoo has another suitor. This time according to Micheal Arrington over at Techcrunch it is a group of high-powered Silicon Valley Execs that will be making a run at Yahoo, using Microsoft as their bank. As Arrington points out, the credit markets are running [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it looks like there is another rumor going around that <a href="http://www.yahoo.com" target="_blank">Yahoo</a> has another suitor. This time according to <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/01/07/investment-group-makes-run-for-yahoo-using-microsofts-money/" target="_blank">Micheal Arrington over at Techcrunch</a> it is a group of high-powered Silicon Valley Execs that will be making a run at Yahoo, using <a href="http://www.microsoft.com" target="_blank">Microsoft</a> as their bank. As Arrington points out, the credit markets are running dry so traditional financing is not a viable option for the deal, but Microsoft has $23 Billion in the bank doing nothing.</p>
<p>The details of the rumored deal is that the investor group will buy Yahoo for around $20 Billion, apparently taking it private, and sell the search and search marketing business to Microsoft for an unknown sum. The group would most likely replace all of the Yahoo Execs, and try to lure some talent back to the company to continue operations of its other businesses.</p>
<p>In the end this may be the best thing for Yahoo. Last year, I may not have been convinced of this, but now I think that Yahoo should dump their search business and focus on their other valuable web properties that have huge potential. For the record I am a Yahoo shareholder.</p>
<p>It is important to note a couple things in this whole story, first, Yahoo, while weakened is still a viable, profitable company, that just seems to have lost it&#8217;s way as of late, mostly due to Microsoft&#8217;s unsolicited deal nearly a year ago. Second, this is all as of right now purely a rumor, and may not ever happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oddjobsintech.com/microsoft-to-get-yahoo-afterall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Migrate Windows User Profiles to a new computer</title>
		<link>http://oddjobsintech.com/179/</link>
		<comments>http://oddjobsintech.com/179/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 01:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oddjobsintech.com/?p=179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the common problems that IT Staff run into is transferring Windows users&#8217; desktop profiles from one computer to another while mainataining all of their customizations, files, settings, favorites, emails, and whatever else. One would think that Microsoft would give IT Pros the tools to transfer this kind of data since they made it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the common problems that IT Staff run into is transferring Windows users&#8217; desktop profiles from one computer to another while mainataining all of their customizations, files, settings, favorites, emails, and whatever else. One would think that Microsoft would give IT Pros the tools to transfer this kind of data since they made it so critical with the advent of Windows NT &amp; 2000.</p>
<p>Fortunately there is a tool put out by ForensIT that makes this a relatively trivial task. You can <a href="http://www.forensit.com/Downloads/User_Profile_Manager_1.06.1018_setup.exe.exe" target="_blank">download it here</a>. After you download it, follow these directions to use it to transfer your profiles seamlessly.</p>
<ol>
<li>Load the computer fully with the appropriate software, including MS Office if needed.</li>
<li>Login and create the account of the user that you wish to transfer.</li>
<li>Either remove and hook up the hard drive from the old computer to the new computer or connect to the computer&#8217;s default share (i.e. \\computername\C$)</li>
<li>After hooking up the drive or connecting to the default share open launch a Windows Explorer window and navigate to &#8220;C:\Documents and Settings&#8221; folder.</li>
<li>Copy the Folder for the user that you wish transfer to the new computer.</li>
<li>On the new computer paste the folder to that same respective folder.</li>
<li>After copying the folder to the new computer, open up the Windows Control Panel, double-click the System icon, and go to the Advanced tab. Click on the &#8220;Settings&#8221; button under the User Profiles section.</li>
<li>Check the “Show Unassigned Profiles” checkbox.</li>
<li>Choose the folder relating to the folder that you wish to assign, and click assign.</li>
<li>Type in the username of the user that you wish to transfer.</li>
<li>Log out and log back in as the migrated user</li>
</ol>
<p>After following those steps you should have a fully migrated user profile. Keep in mind this dows not migrate programs, Windows is still incapable of doing this.</p>
<p>Enjoy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oddjobsintech.com/179/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft to Yahoo: &#8220;Get Lost&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://oddjobsintech.com/microsoft-to-yahoo-get-lost/</link>
		<comments>http://oddjobsintech.com/microsoft-to-yahoo-get-lost/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 22:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oddjobsintech.com/?p=160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve Ballmer, the Microsoft CEO, responded to the latest plea for an acquisition from Jerry Yang, Yahoo&#8217;s CEO, by essentially telling them to get lost. After successfully fending off a hostile Microsoft acquisition, a near shareholder revolt, a mass exodus of high level staff, and their stock subsequently tanking Yahoo is grasping at straws for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.osnews.com/story/20502/Ballmer_Says_Unequivocal_No_to_New_Yahoo_Deal" target="_blank">Steve Ballmer, the Microsoft CEO, responded to the latest plea for an acquisition from Jerry Yang, Yahoo&#8217;s CEO, by essentially telling them to get lost.</a> After successfully fending off a hostile Microsoft acquisition, a near shareholder revolt, a mass exodus of high level staff, and their stock subsequently tanking Yahoo is grasping at straws for their future. I would argue that this is unneeded, Yahoo still has a lot of talent, but they need to reinvent themselves, and stop thinking of themselves as a search engine, a portal, or an ad server; they need to embrace the web properties and other companies that they own (Zimbra) and build upon that to find their niches. Furthermore, they need to dump the properties and companies that are not inline with that niche or are not going to be profitable over the long term.</p>
<p>So in my opinion, if Microsoft&#8217;s is true to their word that they are not interested, Yahoo needs to take this as the final word in this ugly chapter in their history and use it to spur them to build a new exciting company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oddjobsintech.com/microsoft-to-yahoo-get-lost/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t bet on a WebKit-based Microsoft Browser</title>
		<link>http://oddjobsintech.com/dont-bet-on-a-webkit-based-microsoft-browser/</link>
		<comments>http://oddjobsintech.com/dont-bet-on-a-webkit-based-microsoft-browser/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 22:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WebKit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oddjobsintech.com/?p=158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Tech blogs are all a buzz this morning with a revelation that Microsoft may be considering adopting WebKit to use as the rendering engine in Internet Explorer. While I hate to rain on their parade, this will not happen, at least any time soon. Considering that Microsoft is in the process of preparing to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/11/06/microsofts_ballmer_considers_using_webkit_within_ie.html" target="_self">Tech blogs are all a buzz this morning</a> with a revelation that Microsoft may be considering adopting WebKit to use as the rendering engine in Internet Explorer. While I hate to rain on their parade, this will not happen, at least any time soon. Considering that Microsoft is in the process of preparing to release IE 8 within the next year or so, and the release cycle of Internet Explorer has been far and few between it will likely be years off before we see another release of IE.</p>
<p>In addition to the long release cycle, Microsoft has invest significant amounts of money and time into .NET and its tight integration with IE, which is notorious for not working with or rendering well with other browser rendering engines. Even if Microsoft went entirely AJAX for all of their web-based products, there is massive amounts of code from other developers out there that are tailored to run on IE. Microsoft would even have to rework many of their core products to use another rendering engine, an example is Outlook Web Access. OWA is puedo AJAX-based, but it still maintains separate versions for IE and other browsers, not to mention that many of the MMC snapins rely on IE for rendering key components. Would they have to rework these too? Finally, could you imagine Microsoft working on an open source code base that they share with not only the general public, but Apple, and Google?</p>
<p>What I could see Microsoft doing in the short term to test the waters is releasing an unofficial addon that allows you to manually choose to render a page in WebKit. This is much like the IE 8 betas have for rendering as if it were IE7. This would allow them to gauge the demand, as well as test functionality with a new engine, without having to rework, much of their core products. If this were to happen I could see it being released much like the PowerTools have always been released, without official support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oddjobsintech.com/dont-bet-on-a-webkit-based-microsoft-browser/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UPDATE: Google May Jump Ship On Yahoo Ad Deal. Good For Them.</title>
		<link>http://oddjobsintech.com/update-google-may-jump-ship-on-yahoo-ad-deal-good-for-them/</link>
		<comments>http://oddjobsintech.com/update-google-may-jump-ship-on-yahoo-ad-deal-good-for-them/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 19:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oddjobsintech.com/?p=154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It looks like Google finally did bailout of their proposed Ad Deal with Yahoo in an effort to avoid a long legal battle with the DOJ, which was ready file suit to block the deal. I had advocated this in a recent post. This was the right thing to do on Google&#8217;s part, and they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/05/google-pulls-the-plug-on-yahoo-advertising-deal/" target="_blank">Google finally did bailout of their proposed Ad Deal with Yahoo</a> in an effort to avoid a long legal battle with the DOJ, which was ready file suit to block the deal. I had advocated this in a <a href="http://oddjobsintech.com/google-may-jump-ship-on-yahoo-ad-deal-good-for-them/" target="_blank">recent post</a>. This was the right thing to do on Google&#8217;s part, and they were right to delay the deal until the DOJ had time to review it. One would think this would cause Yahoo stock to tank, but it appears that their is also renewed hope of a Microsoft deal causing the stock to rise. While I was at one time opposed to a deal with Microsoft, my opinion is now changed, I think they should do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oddjobsintech.com/update-google-may-jump-ship-on-yahoo-ad-deal-good-for-them/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Howto: VMWare Disk Mount Utility</title>
		<link>http://oddjobsintech.com/howto-vmware-disk-mount-utility/</link>
		<comments>http://oddjobsintech.com/howto-vmware-disk-mount-utility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 07:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMWare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oddjobsintech.com/?p=135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[VMWare quite possibly makes some of the greatest software products in the world. They practically invented the virtualization market, and they are still the market leaders. This is evidenced by the their  add on product for their server and workstation product lines called the Disk Mount Utility (DMU).
The DMU allows you to take the .vmdk [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.vmware.com" target="_blank">VMWare</a> quite possibly makes some of the greatest software products in the world. They practically invented the virtualization market, and they are still the market leaders. This is evidenced by the their  add on product for their server and workstation product lines called the <a href="www.vmware.com/download/eula/diskmount_ws_v55.html" target="_blank">Disk Mount Utility (DMU)</a>.</p>
<p>The DMU allows you to take the .vmdk or hard drive files that are used for your virtual machines and mount and access them in the same way you would a USB Thumb Drive to access the files located on the virtual drive. One might ask, &#8220;Why would you want to do such a thing?&#8221; the answer is simple, what if you just need the files on the VM not the whole VM, do you really want to have to fire up the VM, waste time and resources only to have to copy files between a computer and the VM? This method makes this process much more straight forward. This works well when used in conjunction with<a href="www.vmware.com/products/converter/" target="_blank"> VMWare Converter</a>. If you need more info on Converter, see the <a href="oddjobsintech.com/howto-intro-to-vmware-converter/">VMWare site or my presentation on it</a>.</p>
<p>On to the Howto:</p>
<p>1) <a href=" www.vmware.com/download/eula/diskmount_ws_v55.html" target="_blank">Get the Disk Mount Utility software from VMWare</a>.</p>
<p>2) Install the software.</p>
<p>3) Launch a command prompt. Start &gt; Run and type CMD.</p>
<p>4) Change your working directory to the Install Directory by typing:</p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana;"><strong>cd  “\Program Files\VMware\VMware DiskMount Utility”</strong> </span></span></p>
<p>5) Next you will run the mount program using the format of vmware-mount &lt;the drive letter you wish to mount it to&gt; &lt;the full path to the target virtual disk&gt;</p>
<p>Example:</p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana;"><strong>vmware-mount z: “f:\My Virtual Machines\Windows XP Server 2003\Windows Server 2003 Professional.vmdk”</strong></span></span></p>
<p>Thats it, within a few seconds you should see the drive in the My Computer window. When you are done with the virtual drive simply type the following to dismount it:</p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana;"><strong>vmware-mount /d z:</strong></span></span></p>
<p>If you need further help or want to explore some of the other options available type the following:</p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana;"><strong>vmware-mount/?</strong></span></span></p>
<p>It is also of importance that there are some GUIs out there for this to simplify the process, but they usually are fairly cumbersome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://oddjobsintech.com/howto-vmware-disk-mount-utility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
